Biosafty
Rahmatollah Karimizadeh; Payam Pezeshkpour; Amir Mirzaee; Mohammad Barzali; Farzad Azad Shareki; Peyman Azad Sharaki
Abstract
In order to achieve more high- yielding chickpea genotypes than the existing cultivars that have suitable traits such as seed yield, more number of pods per plant, coarseness of seeds , early maturity and other desired agricultural traits, 16 advanced chickpea genotypes selected from advanced tests ...
Read More
In order to achieve more high- yielding chickpea genotypes than the existing cultivars that have suitable traits such as seed yield, more number of pods per plant, coarseness of seeds , early maturity and other desired agricultural traits, 16 advanced chickpea genotypes selected from advanced tests comparing crop year yield 2015-2016 along with Adel and Azad witness figures for three crop years (2016-2019) in Gachsaran, Gonbad, Khoramabad and Ilam were planted in the form of a completerandomized block design with three replications. Composite variance analysis showed a significant effect of genotype, environment and genotype interaction in the environment (GEI)., Therefore, Biplot method was used to analyze the genotype × environment interaction. The first two principal components explained 32/50 percent (26.12 and 24.2%, respectively) of the total GEI changes. The polygon view of Biplot showed that genotypes 18, 9, 17 and 16 with higher than average performance and near the origin of Bioplate were genotypes with high general stablity. Also genotypes 5, 12 and 11 showed adaptation to many environments. The average tester view of Biplot also showed that genotypes 12, 18 and 9 were the closest genotypes to the ATC axis and therefore the most stable and also had high average yield in different environments. The ideal genotype view of Biplot showed that genotypes 5 and 12 at the closest distance from the Biplot origin were the best genotypes and genotypes 1, 2 and 13 were the most unfavorable genotypes in terms of seed stability and yield.According to the results, genotypes 5, 9, 12 and 16 were selected as promising genotypes and candidates for introduction.
Tissue culture and Micropropagation
Peyman Sharifi; Ahmad Moieni
Volume 6, Issue 13 , May 2016, , Pages 13-26
Abstract
The effect of some factors on embryogenesis from isolated microspore and plantlet regeneration from microspore-derived embryos was studied separately in Brassica napus. Experiments carried out in factorial based on completely randomized design. The first factor in all of the experiments was cultivars ...
Read More
The effect of some factors on embryogenesis from isolated microspore and plantlet regeneration from microspore-derived embryos was studied separately in Brassica napus. Experiments carried out in factorial based on completely randomized design. The first factor in all of the experiments was cultivars contained Global, Option and PF7045/91. The microspores were isolated from 3-4 mm buds and cultured on NLN-13 medium. Cultures incubated at 30˚C and darkness for 14 days, and then transferred to shaker in the growth chamber at 25˚C. In regeneration experiment, embryos with 20-25 days old were transferred to B5 medium and nearly 20-25 days after transferring embryos, normal regenerated plantlets, abnormal regenerated plantlets, rooted embryos and non differentiated embryos were counted. In the first embryogenesis experiments, the effects of medium volume, cultivar and interaction effects of two factors were significant. In Global cultivar, the highest values of embryos (695.5 per Petri) were observed in 12.5 ml medium volume. In the second embryogenesis experiment, the interaction between activated charcoal and cultivar on embryogenesis was significant. In the third embryogenesis experiment, the form of carbohydrate had a significant effect on embryo yield. In the first experiment of plantlet regeneration, GA3 had significant effect on normal regenerated plantlets, abnormal regenerated plantlets, rooted embryos and non differentiated embryos and the interaction between GA3 and cultivar was significant for normal regenerated plantlets. In the second experiment of plantlet regeneration, the interaction between gelling agent and cultivar was significant on normal regenerated plantlets.
